Legal Opinion
State v. Schiebel
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided October 26, 1990No. Nos. 89-583 and 90-85PublishedCited by 663 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.
Because defendants were tried together, many of the issues presented on appeal by the state and on cross-appeal by the defendants are intertwined. To avoid duplication, we therefore resolve issues common to both defendants in either the instant case or State v. Warner (1990), 55 Ohio St. 3d 31, 564 N.E. 2d 54.
89-583
The Motion for New Trial
Immediately after the verdict was rendered on March 2,1987, and before sentencing on March 30, some of Marvin Warner’s attorneys began interviewing jurors in anticipation of litigation in federal court. Attorneys Josephine P. Warner, William H. Jeffress,…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Seasons Coal Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Cupp v. NaughtenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1980
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by663 opinions
- State v. LaMarOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. CurryOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
- State v. PhillipsOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. LaMarOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. WarnerOhio Supreme Court · 1990
658 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.