Legal Opinion

State v. Sallie

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1998No. 97-19PublishedCited by 338 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCook, J.

This court has stated on numerous occasions that trial counsel’s performance will be examined according to the standard set forth in Strickland v. Washington (1984), 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674. Applying the Strickland standard to the case at bar, we hold Sallie’s counsel was not ineffective in failing to present expert witness testimony on battered woman syndrome.

“In order to prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, [Sallie] must show that counsel’s performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness and that prejudice arose from counsel's…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. CarterOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Bostic v. ConnorOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. ThompsonOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State v. KeithOhio Supreme Court · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by338 opinions

  1. Beverly A. Seymour v. Diane Walker,respondent-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  2. Cathryn Ann Linn v. State of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2019
  3. State v. MonfordOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. State v. SallieOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. LilesOhio Court of Appeals · 2014

333 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API