Temple v. Wean United, Inc.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
I
Celebuezze, J.
This is a products liability action brought under theories of negligence, implied warranty, and strict liability in tort. The latter two counts are virtually indistinguishable,1 and appellants concede by their brief that implied warranty has been included as a theory of liability in order to comply with the terminology of Ohio law.
The paramount Ohio decision in the law of products liability is Lonzrick v. Republic Steel Corp. (1966), 6 Ohio St. 2d 227. In Lonsrick this court traced the “slow, orderly and evolutionary development” in this area, and noted that Rogers v. Toni Home…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
- Suvada v. White Motor Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1965
- Webb v. ZernSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- McKisson v. Sales Affiliates, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1967
- Dippel v. ScianoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2,573 opinions
- Van Fossen v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
- State ex rel. Zimmerman v. TompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Bostic v. ConnorOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- State ex rel. Parsons v. FlemingOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Turner v. TurnerOhio Supreme Court · 1993
2,568 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.