Salen v. United States Lines Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brennan
The first question to be decided in this seaman’s personal injury suit for damages on the grounds of unseaworthiness and negligence under the Jones Act1 is whether the jury should have been allowed to determine, in the absence of supporting testimony by an expert in naval architecture, a claim that the shipowner failed to equip his ship with necessary and feasible safety devices to prevent the mishap which befell the seaman.
The trial judge submitted for the jury’s determination various bases of respondent’s alleged liability, including *32the claim resting on the failure to provide certain…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Milwaukee & Saint Paul Railway Co. v. KelloggSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Calmar Steamship Corp. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Grand Trunk Railroad v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Spring Co. v. EdgarSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Wabash Railway Co. v. McDanielsSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by620 opinions
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. Richard Junior FrazierCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Paul Scinto, Sr. v. Warden StansberryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. SepulvedaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Richard S. RASKIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the WYATT COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
615 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.