Hagenmeyer v. Board of Equalization
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Mendocino County. The facts aré stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Foote, C.
This was an application for a writ of review, the purpose of which was to annul an order of the *215board of equalization of Mendocino County increasing the assessment of taxes upon the property of Mr. Hagenmeyer, the plaintiff. The court below seems to have been of the opinion that the board had exceeded its jurisdiction, and ordered that its action in the premises be annulled. From the judgment rendered this appeal is prosecuted.
One question upon which the determination depends, as it appears, is, whether or not the plaintiff had due notice that the board proposed to increase or lower…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Spring Valley Water Works v. SchottlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Humboldt Cty. v. DinsmoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Gladwin v. GladwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- Frisbie v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1876
3Cited by18 opinions
- Universal Consolidated Oil Co. v. ByramCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Bates v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- In re Difference & Controversy between E. M. Derby & Co. & City of ModestoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Cosgriff v. Bd. of Election Commr's of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Farmers' & Merchants' Bank of Los Angeles v. Board of Equalization of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.