Legal Opinion

Bates v. Howard

California Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1894No. 15481PublishedCited by 57 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco granting a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

The Court.

This is an appeal from an order of the superior court in and for the city and county of San Francisco granting a new trial.

On the twenty-seventh day of August, 1887, the defendant made and executed an agreement in writing, of which the following is a copy:

“ San Francisco, August 27,1887.
“ For and in consideration of the sum of one thousand dollars ($1,000) to me in hand paid, and the receipt *175of which I hereby acknowledge, I agree to obtain for George Bates, of Berkeley, a deed to a certain tract of land situated in the county of Alameda, township of Brooklyn, state of California,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Brenham v. StoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
  2. In re Estate of WoodworthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Dickey v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
  4. Hall v. The Bark "Emily Banning"California Supreme Court · 1867
  5. Hagenmeyer v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Green v. SouleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Raulet v. Northwestern Nat'l Ins. Co. of MilwaukeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Smith v. RoyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Hocking v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Trippet v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API