Legal Opinion

Spring Valley Water Works v. Schottler

California Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1882No. 8,052PublishedCited by 42 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from the judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Allen, J. Application for writ of review. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court. • After the decision, a petition for rehearing was presented by the plaintiff.

Read the full summary

Appeal by plaintiff from the judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Allen, J. Application for writ of review. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court. • After the decision, a petition for rehearing was presented by the plaintiff. Similar petitions were also presented by the Nevada Bank of San Francisco, The Pacific Coast Steamship Company, and the Bank of California, as being parties interested in the questions involved though not parties to the action. All of the petitions were denied.

1Opinion of the Court

Thornton, J.:

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, denying the application of the Spring Valley Water Works for a writ of review, and confirming the action of the Board of Equalization of the city and county above named. The writ was sued out to review the action of the Board of Equalization in raising the assessment of the franchise of the Water Works above named from five thousand dollars to five million dollars, and to have it vacated and set aside as being in excess of the jurisdiction of the Board.

It is contended, on behalf of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. Taylor v. SecorSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Providence Bank v. BillingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
  4. The West River Bridge Company v. DIXSupreme Court of the United States · 1848
  5. Society for Savings v. CoiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1868

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Roth Drug, Inc. v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  2. Jacks v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Roehm v. County of OrangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Crocker v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Kaiser Land and Fruit Co. v. CurryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API