Humboldt Cty. v. Dinsmore
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Humboldt County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Foote, C.
This action was instituted under title 7 (seven) of part 3 (three) of the Code of Civil Procedure, for the condemnation of a strip of land belonging to Dinsmore, the appellant, alleged to be necessary for and to be used as a public highway.
Judgment was made and entered for the plaintiff, and from that, and an order refusing him a new trial, the defendant has appealed, the case coming here upon the judgment roll and a bill of exceptions.
It is claimed that the trial court erred in admitting in evidence the petition for the road,—
1. Because it did not show that the proposed road was in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re Grove StreetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Tehama County v. BryanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Damrell v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- Butte County v. BoydstunCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
3Cited by31 opinions
- In re the Bonds of the Madera Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Universal Consolidated Oil Co. v. ByramCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- People v. EbanksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- People v. County of MarinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- People Ex Rel. Skelton v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.