Legal Opinion

Farmers' & Merchants' Bank of Los Angeles v. Board of Equalization of Los Angeles

California Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1893No. 14873PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Temple, C.

This appeal is from a judgment of the superior court of Los Angeles County annulling an order made by the common council of the city of Los Angeles sitting as a board of equalization.

The judgment was rendered in a proceeding under a writ of review, issued upon a petition and the affidavit of John Milner, the cashier of the plaintiff, a corporation doing a general banking business at Los Angeles. No return to the writ was made; but it was stipulated that “ the said petition and the matters stated therein shall be treated and considered as the certified transcript of the record and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Evansville, Indianapolis & Cleveland Straight Line Railroad v. City of EvansvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Spring Valley Water Works v. SchottlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Birdsall v. PhillipsNew York Supreme Court · 1837
  4. Ex parte SternesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Wells, Fargo & Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Matter of HughesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Baker v. LenhartNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Brecht v. HammonsArizona Supreme Court · 1929
  4. De Luca v. Board of Supervisors of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. Traber v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API