Legal Opinion
Universal Consolidated Oil Co. v. Byram
California Supreme Court
Decided December 5, 1944No. L. A. 18121; L. A. 18122PublishedCited by 70 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*355CURTIS, J.
Universal Consolidated Oil Company and Long Beach Harbor Oil Company duly filed with the Board of Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles, sitting as the board of equalization for said county, applications for reduction of the valuations placed by the assessor for the year 1940-1941 upon certain of their oil leases in the Long Beach Harbor-Wilmington Field. The applications were denied by the board, and the oil companies thereupon commenced these actions to enjoin collection of the taxes and to have the court revalue the leasehold interests for assessment purposes. As the premise…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Londoner v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Int. Com. Comm. v. Louis. & Nash. RRSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Los Angeles Gas & Electric Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- De Luz Homes, Inc. v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Fascination, Inc. v. HooverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Kaiser Co. v. ReidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- La Prade v. Department of Water & PowerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- English v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.