Legal Opinion
Derrickson v. Bannett
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided May 27, 1932No. Nos. 20 and 21PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Pennewill, C. J.,
delivering the opinion of the Court:
A motion is made to quash and set aside the returns of the Sheriff of the supposed service of summons in these cases because the service was not made on the Secretary of State as required by law, Chapter 225, Vol. 35, Laws of Delaware, which provides as follows:
“Section 1. That * * * any non-resident owner, operator or driver of any motor vehicle, not registered under the laws of the State of Delaware providing for the registration of • motor vehicles, who shall accept the privilege extended by law to non-residents of this State to operate…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hess v. PawloskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Wuchter v. PizzuttiSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Kane v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Pawloski v. HessMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
- Bennett v. Supreme Tent of the Knights of the Maccabees of the WorldWashington Supreme Court · 1905
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Employers' Liability Assurance Corp. v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1935
- Creadick v. KellerSuperior Court of Delaware · 1932
- Felstead v. Eastern Shore Express, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1932