Legal Opinion

Felstead v. Eastern Shore Express, Inc.

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided May 27, 1932No. 183PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pennewill, C. J.,

delivering the opinion of the Court:

Defendant in the above case appeared specially to argue a motion to quash the writ of summons and the return thereon on the ground that service was effected on the Assistant Secretary of State and not on the Secretary of State as required by law.

The motion to quash is based also on another ground which will be considered after disposing of the first one.

• In the cases of William E. Derrickson and Pearl F. Derrickson v. Charles Bannett, recently decided, 5 W. W. Harr. (35 Del.) 165, 160 A. 907, ah objection similar to the first one made to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Winslow v. Staten Island Rapid Transit Co.New York Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Derrickson v. BannettSuperior Court of Delaware · 1932

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Monacelli v. GrimesSupreme Court of Delaware · 1953
  2. Wise v. HerzogCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  3. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp. v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1935
  4. Syracuse Trust Co. v. KellerSuperior Court of Delaware · 1932
  5. Lightburn v. Delaware Power & Light CompanySupreme Court of Delaware · 1960

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API