Legal Opinion

Wuchter v. Pizzutti

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 20, 1928No. 142PublishedCited by 426 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Taft

This case involves the validity, under tl\e Fourteenth Amendment, of a statute of New Jersey providing for service of process on non-residents of the State in suits for injury by the negligent operation of automobiles on its highways.

Pizzutti was driving a team of horses attached to a wagon on a public highway in New Jersey. Wuchter was a resident of Pennsylvania who was following the wagon with his automobile. Wuchter drove his car so as to crash into the rear of the wagon, damaging it, and injuring Pizzutti and his horses. Pizzutti instituted a suit against Wuchter in the Supreme Court of…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Hess v. PawloskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Hendrick v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Stuart v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  4. Kane v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. McDonald v. MabeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1917

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by426 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Barrows v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. Southern MacHine Company, Inc. v. Mohasco Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
  5. American Power & Light Co. v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1946

421 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API