Legal Opinion
Hess v. Pawloski
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided May 16, 1927No. 263PublishedCited by 748 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Butler
This action was brought by defendant in error to recover damages for personal injuries. The declaration alleged that plaintiff in error negligently and wantonly drove a motor vehicle on a public highway in Massachusetts and that by reason thereof the vehicle struck and injured defendant in error. Plaintiff in error is a. resident of .Pennsylvania.- No personal service was made on him and no property belonging to him was. attached. The service of process was made in compliance with c. 90, General Laws of Massachusetts, as amended by Stat. 1923, c. 431, § 2, the material parts of which follow:
“…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Paul v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Hendrick v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- The Lafayette Ins. Co. v. FRENCHSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
- Kane v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by748 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
743 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.