Legal Opinion
Creadick v. Keller
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided May 27, 1932No. 12PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Pennewill, C. J.,
delivering the opinion of the Court:
In this case objection is made to the service of process and it is based on the plaintiff’s failure to file with his declaration a return receipt signed by the defendant upon receiving by registered mail from the plaintiff a copy of the . process and notice of its service.
The statute, Chapter 225, Vol. 35, Laws of Delaware, provides that
“Service of the legal process provided for in Section 1 * * * shall be made upon the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware in the same manner as is now or may be thereafter provided by law for service…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Derrickson v. BannettSuperior Court of Delaware · 1932
3Cited by14 opinions
- Wise v. HerzogCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
- Employers' Liability Assurance Corp. v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1935
- Nikwei v. Ross School of Aviation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Cherry, Et Ux. v. HeffernanSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
- Syracuse Trust Co. v. KellerSuperior Court of Delaware · 1932
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.