Legal Opinion
In Re Lilly
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided September 18, 1997No. 96-BG-935PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Per curiam
The Board on Professional Responsibility has recommended that Joseph T. Lilly, Esquire, a member of our Bar, be suspended from practice for thirty days for conduct interfering with the administration of justice, in violation of Rule 8.4(d) of the Rules of Professional Conduct, and for failing to respond to an Order of the Board, in violation of D.C. Bar R. XI, § 2(b)(3). The Board has further recommended that Lilly’s reinstatement be conditioned upon his full compliance with Bar Counsel’s requests for information relating to a serious allegation of professional misconduct lodged against him…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re GoldsboroughDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- In Re DelaneyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- In Re LockieDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- In Re SiegelDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- In Re StowDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In Re ArtisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- In Re SteinbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- In Re GilesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
- In Re EdwardsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- In Re HitselbergerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.