Legal Opinion
In Re Stow
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided November 15, 1993No. 93-SP-253PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Per curiam
In its Report and Recommendation, which is attached hereto, the Board on Professional Responsibility concluded that respondent Charles F. Stow III, Esq. neglected the legal interests of his client, in violation of DR 6-101(A)(3). The Board has recommended (a) that respondent be required to repay a $750 fee; (b) that he be suspended for thirty days; (c) that the suspension be stayed for one year; and (d) that respondent be placed on probation for one year, during which his activities would be subject to oversight by a Practice Monitor. The Board based its recommendation on a comprehensive and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re KerseyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- In Re McBrideDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Matter of DoryDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- In Re FosterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Matter of BanksDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- In Re EdwardsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- In Re DunietzDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- In Re ManceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- In Re ReedDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- In re AskewDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.