Legal Opinion
Tarr v. Watkins
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 26, 1960No. Civ. 23977PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFord, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment entered after the general demurrer of respondents, which was directed to each count of the appellant’s amended complaint, was sustained without leave to amend.
The amended complaint consists of two counts. In the first count it is alleged in substance as follows: 1. The plaintiff has been the owner of Lot 16 since April 27, 1948. 2. On September 8, 1950, the plaintiff executed an instrument subjecting her property to a permanent nonexclusive easement consisting of a particularly-described strip of land of the width of 15 feet which was to be used for road…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Lord v. GarlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Winslow v. City of VallejoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Hannah v. PogueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Allen v. San José Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1891
- Haley v. Los Angeles County Flood Control DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Scruby v. Vintage Grapevine, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1995
- Lichty v. SickelsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Salmon v. BradshawSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
- Applegate v. OtaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- City of Los Angeles v. HowardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.