Legal Opinion

Hannah v. Pogue

California Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1944No. L. A. 18365PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.

Plaintiff Mrs. Kate H. Hannah is the owner of approximately a section of land in Tulare County subject to a $50,000 mortgage held by the Regents of the University of California. Through it runs the Kaweah River, from which defendant Harley Smith has for many years diverted water by means of a dam located on plaintiff’s land and a ditch known as the Hamilton Ditch, which also runs through plaintiff’s property. The Hamilton Ditch has been in use since about 1860, and the trial court found that the dam has been in use for over twenty years. The dam in existence before 1920 was built of rock, but…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Davis v. JudsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Blanc v. ConnorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Clapp v. ChurchillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Allen v. San José Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Felsenthal v. WarringCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Rosicrucian Fellowship v. Rosicrucian Fellowship Non-Sectarian ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Big Cottonwood Tanner Ditch Co. v. MoyleUtah Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Ernie v. Trinity Lutheran ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Mello v. WeaverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Martin v. LopesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API