Legal Opinion

Haley v. Los Angeles County Flood Control District

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 23, 1959No. Civ. 23716PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAshburn, J.

Plaintiff sues to quiet title to the unused portion of a strip of land over which his predecessors granted an easement to defendant for flood control purposes. A general demurrer to his second amended complaint was sustained without leave to amend and plaintiff appeals from the ensuing judgment of dismissal.

Plaintiff is the successor in interest to Lucius and Jeannette Vogel who, on August 10, 1932, conveyed to the Flood Control District a perpetual easement for flood control purposes across certain land owned by them. The deed recites that it is made “in the consideration of the benefits to…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Maguire v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Wennerholm v. Stanford University School of MedicineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Columbia Pictures Corp. v. DeTothCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  4. City of Pasadena v. California-Michigan Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Hannula v. Hacienda Homes, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1949

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Gerhard v. StephensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Newby v. Alto Riviera ApartmentsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  3. Western Aggregates, Inc. v. County of YubaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  4. Taschner v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  5. Cherry v. Home Savings & Loan Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1969

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API