Winslow v. City of Vallejo
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
The defendant, the city of Vallejo, appeals from a judgment enjoining it from entering upon certain land belonging to the plaintiff and laying thereon a fourteen-inch pipe, or from entering for any purpose except that of inspecting, repairing, or renewing the water-main already laid across said land.
The findings, which are not attacked, show the following facts: The city of Vallejo has for some years owned and operated a water system for the purpose of supplying the city and its inhabitants with water. The water is impounded in a reservoir situated in Solano County and is thence conveyed…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Herman v. . RobertsNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Allen v. San José Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1891
- Vestal v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Wynkoop v. BurgerNew York Supreme Court · 1815
- Quigley v. BakerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- City of Pasadena v. California-Michigan Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
- Stanislaus Water Co. v. BachmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Houston Pipe Line Company v. DwyerTexas Supreme Court · 1964
- Wright v. BestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Colegrove Water Co. v. City of HollywoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.