Legal Opinion

Applegate v. Ota

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 29, 1983No. Civ. 66783PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

STONE, P. J.

Appellant landowners appeal from a judgment of declaratory relief, finding that respondents had acquired a 20-foot wide prescriptive easement for all purposes necessary or beneficial to the use of respondents’ property which purposes do not impose a greater burden on the servient tenements, ordering removal of all fencing upon said easement, and permanently restraining and enjoining Crocker National Bank from interfering in any way with the easement. We affirm the judgment.

Facts

The subject of this action is a paved roadway located in Carpintería Valley, Santa Barbara…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Beeler v. American Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
  2. O'BANION v. BorbaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Clarke v. ClarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Stromerson v. AverillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Redke v. SilvertrustCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Scruby v. Vintage Grapevine, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1995
  2. Field-Escandon v. DeMannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  3. Brewer v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  4. Aaron v. DunhamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  5. Vieira Enterprises, Inc. v. McCoyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API