Legal Opinion

City of Los Angeles v. Howard

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 30, 1966No. Civ. 28747PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKingsley, J.

This is an appeal by the plaintiffs from a judgment denying injunctive relief to compel removal of alleged obstructions on plaintiffs’ easement, and to exclude the servient owners from using the easement area as a parking lot. We affirm the judgment as entered.

The easement in question was created by reservation in a deed dated December 12, 1919, from the City of Los Angeles to certain grantees. The language of the easement is as follows: “. . . reserving unto said first parties a perpetual easement and right of way 150 feet in width for the purpose of operating, maintaining, repairing and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Hicks v. ReisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. City of Pasadena v. California-Michigan Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Winslow v. City of VallejoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Laux v. FreedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Langazo v. San Joaquin Light & Power Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1939

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Red Mountain, LLC v. Fallbrook Public Utility DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  2. Western Massachusetts Electric Co. v. Sambo's of Massachusetts, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
  3. Glass v. Gulf Oil Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Hacienda Mobile Home ParkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. Village of Wagon Mound v. Mora TrustNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API