Legal Opinion

Verrette v. Chicago & North Western Railway

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1968No. 143PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.

Two issues are presented:(1) Is a railroad grade crossing a place of employment within the terms of the safe-place statute?(2) Did the trial court err in granting defendant’s motion for a directed verdict?

The plaintiff in his complaint alleges the railroad crossing was owned and used as a place of employment by the defendant and the plaintiff was a frequenter, and that the defendant failed to furnish and use safety devices and safeguards reasonably adequate to render such place of employment safe as the nature of the premises permits as required by the safe-place statute. 2

He states that the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Zillmer v. MiglautschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Cirillo v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Rusch v. Sentinel-News Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Delaney v. Supreme Investment Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Smith v. PabstWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Wisconsin Central Transportation Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2004
  2. Kurz v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Glomstead v. Chicago & North Western RailwayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Gamble-Skogmos, Inc. v. Chicago & North Western Transportation Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Kurz v. CHICAGO, M., ST. P. & P. RR. CO.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API