Cirillo v. City of Milwaukee

Three issues are raised on this appeal:(1) Was the trial court correct in finding as a matter of law that defendant Paul Sherry breached no duty to Donald Cirillo ?(2) Was the trial court correct in holding, even if there was a jury question of Paul Sherry’s negligence, the negligence of Donald Cirillo was, as a matter of law, at least 50 percent of the total negligence?(3) Was the trial court correct in concluding that as a matter of law liability should not be imposed upon the defendants under these circumstances because such liability would impose an undue burden on the operation of the…