Glomstead v. Chicago & North Western Railway
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.
Both the claimant and the railroad agree that the court order denying a motion to strike a portion of plaintiff’s complaint is not appeal-able. It is not among the orders listed as appealable in sec. 274.33, Stats. It is not to be held to be the equivalent of a demurrer from which appeal may be taken 1 because it does not seek to strike the whole or entirety of the cause of action stated in the complaint. 2 Substance, not labelling, controls but the motion here made falls short of being, in legal effect, a demurrer to a cause of action. It remains a motion to strike and over an order denying…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State ex rel. Fourth National Bank of Philadelphia v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
- State Ex Rel. Reynolds v. County CourtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- State ex rel. Tewalt v. PollardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
- State v. Chippewa Cable Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Dring v. MainwaringWisconsin Supreme Court · 1918
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Shopper Advertiser, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of RevenueWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. JakubowskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Shopper Advertiser, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of RevenueWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984