Legal Opinion

Glomstead v. Chicago & North Western Railway

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1968No. 41PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.

Both the claimant and the railroad agree that the court order denying a motion to strike a portion of plaintiff’s complaint is not appeal-able. It is not among the orders listed as appealable in sec. 274.33, Stats. It is not to be held to be the equivalent of a demurrer from which appeal may be taken 1 because it does not seek to strike the whole or entirety of the cause of action stated in the complaint. 2 Substance, not labelling, controls but the motion here made falls short of being, in legal effect, a demurrer to a cause of action. It remains a motion to strike and over an order denying…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Fourth National Bank of Philadelphia v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  2. State Ex Rel. Reynolds v. County CourtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  3. State ex rel. Tewalt v. PollardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  4. State v. Chippewa Cable Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Dring v. MainwaringWisconsin Supreme Court · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Shopper Advertiser, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of RevenueWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. JakubowskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Shopper Advertiser, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of RevenueWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API