Rusch v. Sentinel-News Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtNelson, J.
The defendant contends that the civil court properly directed a verdict in its favor; that no error was committed in so doing and that therefore the circuit court erred in reversing the civil court and granting a new trial. The plaintiff contends that the civil court improperly directed the verdict and that the order of the circuit court should be affirmed.
At the outset we desire to consider one of the contentions of the plaintiff based upon what was said in Edwards v. Milwaukee E. R. & L. Co. 191 Wis. 328, 210 N. W. 686. Plaintiff contends that on an appeal to this court from an order of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Powell v. Ashland Iron & Steel Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
- Fontaine v. FontaineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- Kroger v. Cumberland Fruit Package Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
- M. Schulz Co. v. GetherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
- Raether v. Filer & Stowell Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Bentzler v. BraunWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Kozlowski v. John E. Smith's Sons Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. LeachWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
- Zillmer v. MiglautschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Gilson v. Drees Bros.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.