Kurz v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHallows, C. J.
The first issue is whether there was sufficient credible evidence to support the jury’s finding the railroad was negligent. We shall first consider the evidence in respect to the operation and maintenance of the crossing signals. Bluemound Road at the time of the accident was the main arterial going west out of downtown Milwaukee. At the location of the railroad crossing it is a four-lane highway, two westbound lanes and two eastbound lanes, separated by a median strip of some 51 feet. There are two flashing-light signals for the eastbound traffic and two for the westbound traffic, but none…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rhine v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
- Schulz v. CHICAGO, M., ST. P. & PR CO.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
- Haukom v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Cameron v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- Verrette v. Chicago & North Western RailwayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Alcorn v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 2001
- Anderson v. Wisconsin Central Transportation Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2004
- Town of East Troy v. Soo Line Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1976
- Kurz v. CHICAGO, M., ST. P. & P. RR. CO.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1971