Legal Opinion

Kurz v. CHICAGO, M., ST. P. & P. RR. CO.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1971No. 144PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

53 Wis.2d 12 (1971)

192 N.W.2d 97

KURZ, by Guardian ad litem, and another, Respondents,

v.

CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL & PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant.

No. 144.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Argued November 1, 1971.

Decided November 30, 1971.

For the appellant there was a brief by Godfrey, Trump & Davidson, attorneys, and Rodger S. Trump of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Rodger S. Trump.

For the respondents there was a brief by Kersten & McKinnon, attorneys, and Arlo McKinnon of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Arlo McKinnon.

HALLOWS, C. J.

The first issue is whether…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rhine v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
  2. Schulz v. CHICAGO, M., ST. P. & PR CO.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Haukom v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  4. Cameron v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  5. Verrette v. Chicago & North Western RailwayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rodewald, Gerald v. Wisconsin Central Ltd.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API