Kurz v. CHICAGO, M., ST. P. & P. RR. CO.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
53 Wis.2d 12 (1971)
192 N.W.2d 97
KURZ, by Guardian ad litem, and another, Respondents,
v.
CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL & PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant.
No. 144.
Supreme Court of Wisconsin.
Argued November 1, 1971.
Decided November 30, 1971.
For the appellant there was a brief by Godfrey, Trump & Davidson, attorneys, and Rodger S. Trump of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Rodger S. Trump.
For the respondents there was a brief by Kersten & McKinnon, attorneys, and Arlo McKinnon of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Arlo McKinnon.
HALLOWS, C. J.
The first issue is whether…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rhine v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
- Schulz v. CHICAGO, M., ST. P. & PR CO.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
- Haukom v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Cameron v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- Verrette v. Chicago & North Western RailwayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Rodewald, Gerald v. Wisconsin Central Ltd.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2022