Delaney v. Supreme Investment Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBaelow, J.
This case was tried on the theory and claim that defendants failed to construct and maintain the building so as to render it safe under the provisions of sec. 101.06, Stats., commonly referred to as the “safe-place statute.” Appellants contend this statute does not apply.
The safe-place statute first became the law of this state by the enactment of ch. 485, Laws of 1911. As enacted it con-cededly applied only to employees and frequenters and places of employment. Sec. 2394-r-48, Stats. 1911, provided that employers “shall furnish a place- of employment which shall be safe for employees therein…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Wisconsin Bridge & Iron Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
- Johnson v. Prange-Geussenhainer Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
- Highway Trailer Co. v. Janesville Electric Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
- Sullivan v. School District No. 1 of the City of TomahWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
- Waldman v. Young Men's Christian Ass'n of JanesvilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- The American Exchange Bank of Madison, Wisconsin, as of the Estate of Pauline H. Williams, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1958
- Department of Natural Resources v. Wisconsin Power & Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
- Szafranski v. RadetzkyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Bennett v. Larsen Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- Weiss v. HolmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.