Legal Opinion

Halsey v. Robinson

California Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 1942No. L. A. No. 17954PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOUSER, J. —

The plaintiffs herein appeal from a judgment rendered on the defendants’ cross-complaint by which the court decreed specific performance of a lease.

The plaintiffs, George W. Halsey and Frances L. Halsey (husband and wife) and Joseph Halsey, who are the owners of farm land in Kern County brought this action to compel restitution of the property which was held by M. R. Robinson and his wife under a purported lease. The plaintiffs also sought to recover rents, profits and damages which allegedly had accrued during the withholding period. The defendants answered and cross-complained,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Seymour v. OelrichsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Notten v. MensingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Swartzbaugh v. SampsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. Wilson v. BaileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Fleming v. DolfinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Columbia Pictures Corp. v. DeTothCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Wilk v. VencillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Le Blond v. WolfeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. Ford v. Palisades Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1950
  5. Paramount Pictures Corporation v. HoldenDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1958

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API