Legal Opinion

Swartzbaugh v. Sampson

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 27, 1936No. Civ. 1605PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

This is an action to cancel two leases executed by .John Josi anBwartzbaugh, as lessor, to Sam A. Sampson, as lessee, of two adjoining parcels of land in Orange County. A motion for nonsuit was granted at the close of plaintiff's case and this appeal followed.

Defendant Swartzbaugh and plaintiff are husband and wife. They owned, as joint tenants with the right of survivorship, sixty acres of land in Orange County planted to bearing walnuts. In December, 1933, defendant Sampson started negotiations with plaintiff and her husband for the leasing of a small fraction of this land fronting on…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Siberell v. SiberellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Earp v. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  3. Watford Oil & Gas Co. v. ShipmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Varnum v. AbbotMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1815
  5. Dorn v. DunhamTexas Supreme Court · 1859

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Tompkins v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Stark v. CokerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Tenhet v. BoswellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Hammond v. McArthurCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  5. McDonald v. MorleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API