Legal Opinion
Le Blond v. Wolfe
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 16, 1948No. Civ. 15920PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VALLEE, J. pro tem.
Appeal by defendant Bisno from a judgment for plaintiff in an action for a real estate broker’s commission.
Plaintiff, a licensed real estate broker, was employed by owners of real property, situate in Eureka, California, to effect a sale of the property. The price asked included a commission of $5,000 to plaintiff. Plaintiff interested Bisno in purchasing the property. After some negotiation Bisno orally informed plaintiff that he would huy the property if he could do so at the asking price less plaintiff’s $5,000 commission. Bisno orally asked plaintiff to release the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Dickerson v. ColgroveSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Columbia Pictures Corp. v. DeTothCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Carpy v. DowdellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Wilson v. BaileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Wilk v. VencillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Monarco v. Lo GrecoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Albert H. And Doris G. Throndson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Albert H. And Doris G. Throndson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, J. Leonard Schmitz and Alice Schmitz v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- Steiner v. RowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Beazell v. SchraderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Phillippe v. Shapell Industries, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1987
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.