Legal Opinion
Ford v. Palisades Corp.
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 28, 1950No. Civ. 17752PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VALLÉE, J.
Appeal by plaintiff from an adverse judgment in an action to recover a broker’s commission.
September 18, 1944, plaintiff and defendant entered into an agreement in writing which read:
“Mr. Leland M. Ford
15821 Sunset Boulevard
Pacific Palisades, Calif.
Dear Sir:
‘1 In consideration of the services to be rendered by you, we hereby agree to employ you as our agent for the period ending September 6, 1945, to find a puchaser for the so-called beach property, owned by this corporation, consisting of approxi mately 2411 feet, located on the Roosevelt Highway immediately west of the Will Rogers…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Overton v. Vita-Food Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1949
- Connell v. BowesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- People v. Metropolitan Surety Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
- Bixby v. HotchkisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Farnsworth v. HunterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- C & K ENGINEERING CONTRACTORS v. Amber Steel Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
- Raedeke v. Gibraltar Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Augustine v. TruccoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Wyler Summit Partnership, a Partnership v. Turner Broadcasting System, Inc., a Georgia Corporation Turner Entertainment Co., a Georgia CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Jaffe v. Albertson Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.