Legal Opinion

Giles v. St. Charles Health System, Inc.

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided October 22, 2013No. 6:13-cv-00019-AAPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

AIKEN, Chief Judge:

Plaintiffs Carol Giles, Shawn Dunlap, Cheryl Fischer, Melodin Cornis, and Mary Ann Adler move for class certification pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 23. Defendant St. Charles Health System, Inc. opposes plaintiffs’ motion. For the reasons set forth below, plaintiffs’ motion is granted.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs are employed as registered nurses at defendant’s hospitals. Defendant requires its hourly nurses and certain other employees (collectively “caregivers”) to fulfill training and certification requirements, which are not necessary to maintain an Oregon nursing…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Comcast Corp. v. BehrendSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Arredondo v. Delano Farms Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2014
  2. Cromeans v. Morgan Keegan & Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 2014
  3. A.F. v. Providence Health PlanDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2013
  4. Magallon v. Robert Half International, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2015
  5. Azar v. Blount International Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2019

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API