Legal Opinion
Cromeans v. Morgan Keegan & Co.
District Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided September 23, 2014No. 2:12-CV-04269-NKLPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
NANETTE K. LAUGHREY, District Judge.
Pending befoi’e the Coux’t is the Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification [Doe. 218]. The motion is granted in part and denied in part.
*549I. Background
On July 15, 2010, the City of Moberly, Missouri approved the issuance of $89 million in municipal bonds by the Industrial Development Authority of the City of Moberly (the IDA). The IDA issued the bonds to finance a project that included acquiring and improving a 33-acre parcel of land, and constructing and equipping a sueralose manufacturing and processing facility in Moberly. The facility was to be…
2Cases cited70 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. LundbergCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2017
- CIS Communications, L.L.C. v. Republic Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2025
- Cody v. City of St. LouisDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2021
- Cody v. City of St. LouisDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2022
- Diesel v. Mariani Packing Company, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2024
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.