Legal Opinion

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 20, 2011No. 10-277PublishedCited by 4,622 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scalia

We are presented with one of the most expansive class actions ever. The District Court and the Court of Appeals approved the certification of a class comprising about one and a half million plaintiffs, current and former female employees of petitioner Wal-Mart who allege that the discretion exercised by their local supervisors over pay and promotion matters violates Title VII by discriminating against women. In addition to injunctive and declaratory relief, the plaintiffs seek an award of backpay. We consider whether the certification of the plaintiff class was consistent with Federal Rules…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4,622 opinions

  1. Jennings v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  2. Comcast Corp. v. BehrendSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. Amgen Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust FundsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Tyson Foods, Inc. v. BouaphakeoSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  5. A.A.R.P. v. TrumpSupreme Court of the United States · 2025

4,617 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API