Comcast Corp. v. Behrend
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scalia
*29 The District Court and the Court of Appeals approved certification of a class of more than 2 million current and former Comcast subscribers who seek damages *1430 for alleged violations of the federal antitrust laws. We consider whether certification was appropriate under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(3).
I
Comcast Corporation and its subsidiaries, petitioners here, provide cable-television services to residential and commercial customers. From 1998 to 2007, petitioners engaged in a series of transactions that the parties have described as "clustering," a strategy of concentrating…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,534 opinions
- Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Genesis HealthCare Corp. v. SymczykSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Tyson Foods, Inc. v. BouaphakeoSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Mulvania v. Sheriff of Rock Island CountyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- Victor Parsons v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
1,529 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.