Legal Opinion
Arredondo v. Delano Farms Co.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided February 21, 2014No. 1:09-cv-01247 MJSPublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER PARTIALLY GRANTING MOTIONS TO DECERTIFY CLASS
MICHAEL J. SENG, United States Magistrate Judge.
On April 19, 2011, the Court granted in part Plaintiffs’ Sabas Arrendondo, Jose Cue-vas, Hilario Gomez, Irma Landeros and Ro-salba Landeros (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) motion seeking class certification pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (ECF No. 85.) On March 22, 2013, Defendants filed separate motions for decer-tification of the class.1 (ECF Nos. 273, 275.) On April 29, 2013, Plaintiffs filed a single opposition to both decertification motions. (ECF No. 286.)…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Comcast Corp. v. BehrendSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Sali ex rel. Themselves v. Corona Reg'l Med. Ctr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Millan v. Cascade Water Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2015
- Chen-Oster v. Goldman, Sachs & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Rodriguez v. Danell Custom Harvesting, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2018
- Moore v. Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.