Legal Opinion
A.F. v. Providence Health Plan
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided December 24, 2013No. 3:13-cv-00776-SIPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MICHAEL H. SIMON, District Judge.
Plaintiffs AF. and AP. (collectively “Plaintiffs”) bring this putative class action against Defendant Providence Health Plan (“Providence”). Plaintiffs claim that Providence illegally denied coverage to Plaintiffs as members of Providence-issued group health plans in Oregon of the therapeutic technique of Applied Behavior Analysis (“ABA”). Plaintiffs move to certify a class under Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(b)(2). Dkt. 36. Plaintiffs seek injunctive and declaratory relief, asking the Court to enjoin Providence from denying coverage based on its…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Comcast Corp. v. BehrendSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Amgen Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust FundsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Wit v. United Behavioral HealthDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2016
- A.F. ex rel. Legaard v. Providence Health PlanDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2014
- Briscoe v. Health Care Services CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020
- Caldwell v. UnitedHealthcare Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020
- Doe v. TrumpDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2020
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.