Wuertz v. Howard
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JOE W. WOOD, Judge, Court of Appeals.
The issue is whether plaintiff was a special employee. We hold that he was.
' Delhi-Taylor Oil Corporation contracted with Sharp Drilling Company (hereinafter referred to as Sharp) to drill a well on its oil well drilling location. Delhi-Taylor also contracted with Halliburton Company (hereinafter referred to as Halliburton) to furnish cementing service for the well. Plaintiff was on the location as a general employee of Sharp. Howard was on the location as an employee of Halliburton.
Howard was transferring cement from a Halliburton truck to a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Jones v. George F. Getty Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1937
- Rhinelander Paper Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- Shipman v. MacCo CorporationNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
- Bogart v. HesterNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1959
- Beal Ex Rel. Boatwright v. Southern Union Gas Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1956
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Monett v. Dona Ana County Sheriff's PosseNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1992
- Rivera v. Sagebrush Sales, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
- Barger v. Ford Sales Company, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
- Lindsey v. Bucyrus-ErieCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
- Growers Co. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.