Legal Opinion

Jones v. George F. Getty Oil Co.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided September 7, 1937No. 1525PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge.

Appellant Frank D. Jones commenced this action, as plaintiff, against appellee, Getty Oil Company, as defendant, to recover damages for personal injrtry. His co-appellant, Associated Indemnity Corporation, having intervened, filed its amended plea in intervention for subrogation., The parties will be herein referred to as they appeared in the lower court, to wit: Frank D. Jones, as plaintiff; Associated Indemnity Corporation, as inter-vener; and George F. Getty Oil Company, as defendant.

Plaintiff individually and for use of intervener in his petition declared that…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. Singer Manufacturing Co. v. RahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Driscoll v. TowleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
  4. Denton v. Yazoo & Mississippi Valley RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Wyllie v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1893

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Volb v. G.E. Capital Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  2. Shipman v. MacCo CorporationNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Tipton v. ClowerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Harless v. EwingNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. Bendure v. Great Lakes Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1967

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API