Legal Opinion

Bogart v. Hester

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1959No. 6439PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN R. BRAND, District Judge.

Plaintiff Harold L. (Louie) Bogart lived at Farmington about a block from the premises of Hester Mud Company, for whom he had formerly worked. His uncle, Carl Rucker, was employed by Hester Mud Company as a foreman, and lived on the Mud Company yard. On the day of the accident, Bogart, who often visited his uncle, to the knowledge of Mr. Hester, went to the mud yard to borrow a tool from his uncle with which to repair an air-conditioner at his house. While there talking to the uncle, the defendant James Engelbrecht, a truck driver for defendant American Tank &…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kelly v. TyraSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  2. Mulcahy v. DieudonneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  3. Newman v. Fox West Coast TheatresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. Lucas v. WalkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
  5. Snider v. Town of Silver CityNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1952

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Herrera Ex Rel. Estate of Ruiz v. Quality PontiacNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Ramirez v. ArmstrongNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Reed v. StyronNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Klopp v. Wackenhut Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Harless v. EwingNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API