Legal Opinion

Rhinelander Paper Co. v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1931PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.

The facts are not in dispute and as stated by the Industrial Commission are as follows :

“There is no dispute but what this applicant was a regular employee of the Rhinelander Paper Company and had been such for the past four years. At the time of and for some few days preceding the injury the American Engineering Company were making some replacements in the boilers of the Rhinelander Paper Company, under contract and with the American Engineering Company, having from twelve to fifteen of their own employees on the premises of the Rhine-lander Paper Company in doing this work. The chief…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Seaman Body Corp. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Spodick v. Nash Motors Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Nepstad v. LambertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  2. Clark v. Luther McGill, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Stuyvesant Corp. v. WaterhouseSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
  4. Blessing v. T. Shriver and Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
  5. Turner v. Schumacher Motor Express, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API