Barger v. Ford Sales Company, Inc.
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUTIN, Judge.
Defendants appeal an adverse judgment awarded plaintiff under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. They contend that (1) plaintiff was not an employee of Ford Sales Company, Inc. (Ford) ; (2) that if plaintiff was an employee, he was under “casual employment”; (3) plaintiff was an independent contractor; and (4) plaintiff was not 40% disabled. We affirm.
Findings of Fact
The trial court found:
1. That on April 13, 1972, plaintiff was hired by Ford to unload a truckload shipment of doughnut mix and place it in Ford’s warehouse.
2. That plaintiff was under the supervision and control…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Medina v. Zia CompanyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975
- Shipman v. MacCo CorporationNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
- Dunham v. WalkerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1955
- Perea v. Board of Torrance County CommissionersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- Abbott v. DonathonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Anaya v. New Mexico Steel Erectors, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
- Jelso v. World Balloon Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981
- Savinsky v. Bromley Group, Ltd.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987
- Monett v. Dona Ana County Sheriff's PosseNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1992
- Eberline Instrument Corp. v. FelixNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.