Legal Opinion
Shipman v. MacCo Corporation
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided May 4, 1964No. 7389PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOISE, Justice.
This is an action for damages alleged to have been suffered by plaintiff-appellant because of the negligence of the defendantsappellees.
Defendants allege that plaintiff was their employee and that accordingly he is entitled to workmen's compensation and may not sue in tort. §§ 59-10-5, 59-10-6, N.M. S.A.1953; Royal Indemnity Company v. Southern California Petroleum Corporation, 67 N.M. 137, 353 P.2d 358. The trial court agreed with this position and entered summary judgment in favor of defendants. This appeal followed.
It appears from the pleadings, affidavits and depositions on…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Standard Oil Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Singer Manufacturing Co. v. RahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Linstead v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Hull v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Royal Indemnity Co. v. Southern California Petroleum Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Ute Park Summer Homes Ass'n v. Maxwell Land Grant Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- Scott v. Murphy CorporationNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
- Antonini v. Hanna IndustriesNevada Supreme Court · 1978
- General Electric Credit Corporation v. TidenbergNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- Blessing v. T. Shriver and Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.