Growers Co. v. Industrial Commission
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FERNANDEZ, Presiding Judge.
Petitioner The Growers Company (GC) contends that the administrative law judge (AU) erroneously found that the claimant, Jesus Fimbres, was an employee of GC, arguing that the AU should have determined instead that respondent Growers Transplanting, Inc. (GTI) was Fimbres’s special employer, dual employer, or statutory employer. We disagree and affirm the award.
Fimbres testified that he began working for GC in 1988 and continued when work was available through the date of his accident in September 1990. He worked as a tractor driver, truck driver, and laborer.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Butler v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1937
- Young v. Environmental Air Products, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1983
- Word v. Motorola, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1983
- Home Insurance v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1979
- Post v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONAArizona Supreme Court · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Labor Force v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
- Douglas Auto & Equipment v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- James Perrussel and Deborah Perrussel v. Stainless Construction Company Dba Sg Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995