McLaughlin v. Knobloch
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.
The plaintiffs are owners of certain lots fronting on Blackstone Avenue in the city of Fresno.
Their complaint alleged that defendants claimed a lien on said lots based on a certain warrant, assessment, and diagram made and issued by the superintendent of streets of the city of Fresno, on June 19, 1907, authorizing and empowering defendants to demand and receive certain assessments upon each of the lots of the plaintiffs described in the complaint; that said warrant, assessment, and diagram purported to be issued under a contract for certain sidewalk work on said Blackstone Avenue in said city…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Chase v. City Treasurer of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Lambert v. BatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Manning v. DenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Capeon v. HitchcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Diggins v. HartshorneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Hannon v. MaddenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- M. H. Walker Realty Co. v. American Surety Co. of New YorkUtah Supreme Court · 1922
- O'Bryan v. Mengel CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
- Rogers Brothers Co. v. BeckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Brandenstein v. JacklingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.