Manning v. Den
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from au order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
— Action to foreclose the lien of a street assessment.
1. It is alleged in the complaint that on the fifteenth day of October, 1888, the city council of Los Angeles awarded to the-assignors of the plaintiff a contract for *613doing the work upon which the assessment in question was afterwards issued; that the clerk posted a notice of said award “ on the seventeenth day of October, 1888, and for five days thereafter ”; that afterwards, on the twenty-second day of October, 1888, the street superintendent entered into a contract with the plaintiff's assignors to- do said work, and thereafter made the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Dougherty v. HitchcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Burke v. TurneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
3Cited by23 opinions
- Crowe v. BoyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Chase v. City Treasurer of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Imperial Land Co. v. Imperial Irr. Dist.California Supreme Court · 1916
- Oakland Paving Co. v. Whittell Realty Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
- McLaughlin v. KnoblochCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.