Legal Opinion

Lambert v. Bates

California Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1902No. S.F. No. 3034PublishedCited by 23 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

Action to foreclose a street assessment upon certain property in the town of Berkeley. Judgment-was rendered in favor of the defendant, and the plaintiff has appealed.

The contract for the work upon which the assessment was made provided that a portion of Alcatraz Avenue should be macadamized and guttered to the official line and grade. After the assessment was made the defendant appealed therefrom to the town council, and also from the act of the superintendent of streets in approving the work, and determining that the plaintiff had macadamized and guttered the street to the official grade,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Culross v. . GibbonsNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Demarest v. . DargNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
  3. Appeal of S. O. HoughtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Diggins v. HartshorneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Warren v. RiddellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Spring Street Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Burns v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Blake v. City of EurekaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Hannon v. MaddenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Crawford v. FranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API